|
|
| Research |
|
|
|
Decoherence |
| |
|
| |
One
of the new frontier areas of mesoscopic systems is
the measurement of transport properties on the time
scale comparable to or shorter than the phase
coherence time of the individual electrons or the
transit times of the electron through the sample.
We are currently measuring the weak localization
signals at 250 mK from single 48-50 Ohm, 100 um long
mesoscopic Au wires, with a width and thickness of
about 100 nm. We are using a home built
reflectometer to measure both the in-phase and
out-of-phase change in reflection coefficient as we
sweep the magnetic field from500
Gauss. In order to measure the phase coherence
length,
Lj
at any frequency,
we must be able to resolve changes in the reflection
coefficient as small as 3x10-6 at high
frequencies and fit to the existing theory. |
| |
|
| |
An example of the
fractional change in the resistance of our sample as
a function of magnetic field at 250 mK and a 442 MHz
drive frequency is shown in Figure 1 along with the
fit to theory we use to extract
Lj.
The phase coherence length is 6.4 and the phase coherence time is
tj=Lj2/D=0.6ns
where D is the diffusion constant of the sample. We
have reliable in-phase and out-of- phase data up to
900 MHz thus far (wtj=4).
Above 900MHz the signal to noise deteriorates very
quickly. Figure 2 displays the frequency dependence
of our data together with a fit to the expected
signal for both the in-phase and out-phase
components. This fit assumes no frequency dependence
of any parameter including
Lj
and D and demonstrates
that there is no additional decoherence due to
frequency
contrary to previous theoretical expectations that
at
wtj=1
significant decoherence should
occur. This is in agreement with
earlier experimental work. More recent theory
suggests that only when hf/kBT>1
should significant decoherence start to set in. We
are currently trying to work at 50 mK and
frequencies as high as 10 GHz, hf/kBT>8,
in order for the first time to test this prediction. To our knowledge this frequency range
has not yet been studied in any transport
measurement on phase coherent mesoscopic systems but
it could represent the upper limit for the frequency
response of any device that relies upon electron
phase coherence for operation. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Entanglement |
|
|
| |
Entanglement is a unique and "inexplicable" concept
in quantum mechanics. It describes some sort of
non-local correlation between quantum objects.
Besides its importance for understanding fundamental
physics, entanglement is also believed to be
essential for building a quantum computer. The
research in our group on entanglement is trying to
demonstrate the capability of producing entangled
electron spin states using solid state devices
called quantum dots. |
|
|
|
| |
We
start with a two dimensional electron gas system in
a GaAs/AlGaAs heterostructure. By depositing metal
gates (bright patterns in the figure below) on top
of the wafer and then applying negative voltages on
these gates, we are able to deplete the electrons
underneath them. Therefore electrons can only move
in the area where no gate is on top. By carefully
designing the shape of gates, we can precisely
control the motion of electrons. For example, gates
1, 2, 3, and 4 are used to form a quantum dot. The
sample here shows two quantum dots placed very close
to each other, only separated by the potential
barrier generated by the negative voltage on gate 1.
By tuning this voltage, we can vary the interaction
between the electron spins, assuming the ideal case
where each quantum dot houses one electron. Theory
predicts that under certain conditions the two spins
can form a singlet state, which is an entangled
state. Thus the coupled quantum dots give us the
possibility of studying entanglement in solid state
devices. |
|
|
|
|
 |
|
|
| |
It is
generally believed that only a violation of Bell's
inequalities can be considered as a real
demonstration of entanglement. In this particular
case, it means that one should spatially separate
the two spins after they interact with each other,
and then perform independent single spin
measurements on both electrons to investigate the
correlation between their spin states. This is a
formidable task with today's technology. Instead, we
follow the suggestion by theorists and carry out
shot noise measurements in the system. The basic
idea is as follows. We inject electrons to both dots
through reservoirs A and B and let them interact
with each other. We then force them to come out of
the dots and direct them to a beam splitter (the
small opening between gates 1 and 11) where the
spatial wave functions of both electrons overlap.
Depending on the spin states of the electrons, they
will be scattered into different out-going states.
For example, in the case of two electrons in a
singlet, they always go to the same direction after
the beam splitter (either to reservoir C or D). This
is called a bunching effect. As a result, the
presence of entanglement will alter the shot noise
of the currents flowing into C and D. |
|
|
|
| |
We
performed shot noise measurements in these samples
at very low temperatures (around 70 mK). At this
moment, we have some preliminary results showing a
hint of entanglement. The shot noise observed has
some qualitative agreements with theory. However, we
are still puzzled by certain aspects of the data. In
addition, a quantitative agreement is still missing. |
|
|
|
|
Shot noise of mesoscopic
conductors |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Spin transport |
|
|
| |
Our work focuses on interface spin
scattering in mesoscopic metallic Co-Cu-Co
spin-valves showing that the spins (or
intrinsic magnetic moments) of electrons can be
flipped as they travel across magnetic interfaces.
We performed comprehensive measurements of the 4
probe non-local spin-injection resistance because
this configuration provides an effective decoupling
between spin and charge transport. We showed that
in this geometry an additional figure of merit,
which characterizes the difference in the spin-flip
rates for spin up and down electrons at the
interface, can be measured. We have observed a
temperature-dependent asymmetry in the nonlocal
resistance between parallel (RP) and
antiparallel (RAP) relative orientations
of the magnetizations in the ferromagnetic injector
and detector. Unlike the standard analysis of the
spin-valve signal RP-RAP,
which has been extensively studied, we studied in
detail the symmetric contribution to resistance, RS=(RP+RAP)/2
using a nonlocal geometry which eliminates any
artifacts due to non-spin-related effects. This
symmetric contribution to the non-local spin
injection has been previously completely overlooked
and has been thought of as being an artifact.
However, our work reveals that the temperature
dependent asymmetry of the nonlocal resistance
carries key information about the nature of
interfacial spin scattering. We show that RS
is intrinsic to the process of spin injection
and detection and signifies the presence of spin
non-conserved interfaces. At low temperatures RS
vanishes, as expected, but as temperature increases
Rs increases nonlinearly, and at room temperature
more than 30% of the spin transport at the detector
interface between Co and Al2O3
involves spin-flip events. By performing
measurements over a wide temperature range it was
shown that the conventional analysis of spin
injection experiments is no longer valid at higher
temperatures. After carefully showing that the
existence of a nonvanishing Rs is not an artifact,
we find that these results can be explained by the
existence of spin-dependent spin-flip scattering at
the interface, which at room temperature limits the
spin injection efficiency. We believe, that in
contrast to previous interpretations, the efficiency
and the temperature dependence of spin injection are
likely to be controlled by the spin-flip rate (a
transport quantity) rather than by an estimated
Curie temperature of an injector (a thermodynamic
quantity). |
|
|
|
| |
Future research in this area will concentrate on
interfacial spin transport in magnetic tunnel
junctions by means of shot noise measurements, which
are extremely sensitive to the details of transport. |
|
|
|
|
|