| Research |
| Samir
Y. Garzon |
Research Assistant Professor
Department of Physics & Astronmy
and USC Nanocenter
University of South Carolina |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
MMM 2008 Invited Talk
|
|
|
Publications
|
Macrospin
model of incubation delay due to the field-like spin transfer torque
|
|
|
|
Direction-controlled
Growth and Characterization of Indium Nitride Nanowires
|
|
MRS 2009 Proceedings
|
|
Submitted
|
|
|
|
Alkanethiol
induced changes in the magnetotransport properties of Co/Au bilayers
|
|
MMM 2008 Proceedings
|
|
Accepted
|
|
|
|
Coherent control of nanomagnet dynamics via ultrafast
spin torque pulses (Featured in Physics 1, 33 (2008))
|
|
|
| Synthesis and Properties of High-Quality InN Nanowires
and Nano-networks |
|
|
| Enhanced Spin Dependent Shot Noise in Magnetic Tunnel
Barriers |
|
|
| Temperature-Dependent Asymmetry of
the Nonlocal Spin-Injection Resistance: Evidence for Spin Nonconserving
Interface Scattering |
|
|
|
PhD Dissertation
Dissertation
defense slides (ppt)
|
|
| |
|
PhD research
|
| |
|

|
My PhD work was on spin injection and
detection in spin valve structures using both transport measurements
and magnetic force microscopy. I fabricated mesoscopic scale structures
like the ones shown in the left by using standard electron beam
lithography, lift-off, and metal deposition techniques, on an Si-SiO2
substrate. This particular sample shows two Cobalt electrodes of
different length connected with a thin vertical Copper line and four
additional probing contacts. By applying an external field parallel to
the ferromagnetic (Cobalt) electrodes, their magnetization state can be
independently controlled (due to their difference in shape anisotropy).
|
|
|
A schematic representation of the above
device is shown in the right. A typical transport experiment consists
of injecting a current between T1 and N1 as shown
(grounding N1) and measuring the voltage between terminals T2
and N2 with a high input impedance device. Our measurements
are "nonlocal" in the sense that there is no charge current between F1
and F2, so the voltage is due completely to electron spin
diffusion (a spin current). The measured voltage depends on the
magnetization states of the ferromagnetic electrodes: due to the
current perpendicular to plane (CPP) magnetoresistance effect, the
electrons can diffuse more easily between injector (F1) and
detector (F2) when their magnetization states are parallel
than when they are anti-parallel. The measured voltage also decreases
(in magnitude) as the separation between injector and detector
increases due to spin relaxation, hence by measuring samples with
varying lengths L it is possible to extract the spin relaxation length l of electrons in the nonmagnetic material (N, in
our case Copper).
|

|
|
 |
The figure on the left shows the typical
parallel magnetic field dependence of the nonlocal resistance, defined
as the ratio of the measured voltage to the applied current, at 4.2 K.
The symmetry between parallel and anti-parallel magnetizations of the
ferromagnets is clear.
|
|
|
If the magnetic field is applied
perpendicular to the plane, the spin of the electrons precesses as they
diffuse between injector and detector producing the typical bell shaped
curve of the Hanle effect. From a single Hanle effect measurement it is
possible to extract the spin relaxation length and the product of the
"spin polarizations" (not exactly...) of the injector and detector.
|

|
|
|

|
| At higher temperatures the symmetry between the
values of the nonlocal resistance for aligned and anti-aligned
magnetization of injector and detector disappears and there is an
additional nonlinear offset which is also due to spin and which we
believe appears due to the difference of interfacial spin flip
scattering of majority and minority carriers at the detector. For more
details please see any of the following resources:
|
|
|